At first glance both of these photography disciplines involve talking photos of properties so they must be pretty much the same right? Some of you may then be shocked to find that an Architectural photoshoot is likely to be in the £thousands range and require several days compared to the a few £100s and a few hours that is Real-estate photography.
So some of you maybe wondering what the heck is going on to justify the costs and what extra do you really get?
First thing to advise is that you will never employ/commission an architectural photoshoot for a poky student flat in the city. Even if you are going to clean, tidy, and paint your property and pay to get it on the front page of your local estate agency or management agency marketing media, you are still only going to need a real-estate photographer.
Secondly it would be understandable for a real-estate photographer to turn down an Architectural photoshoot, and equally an architectural photographer to be insulted to shoot a real-estate job.
Reasons being is that a real-estate photographer will gawk at the amout of extra effort required to shoot architecturally and a architectural photographer would not want to put their name to "lower" quality work.
Basically:
Real-estate Photography: showing the property as a whole, its size, shape, the layout of the rooms and the relationships between rooms.
Requirements: wide as possible, basic lighting, basic editing, every room.
Architectural Photography : Taking timeless images with attention to details, architectural design features, interior design features, artistic relationships between spaces, lighting and design elements.
Requirements: Be an artist. multiple off camera lighting and natural lighting control, Time, advanced editing, considerations for final print / media usage.
More detail:
Real-estate Photography in all honesty is not as high end as architectural photography. There is greater time and budget considerations and usually "average" properties getting shots for an average sales or marketing for letting are not set up in a way that warrants the expense for architectural photography. The majority of properties, do not have "special" details, design aspects of interest, a considered integration of lighting and interior elements such as furniture, decoration and space layout. This is true also of new build properties even if they are fully dressed/interiorly designed for show. Architectural Photography is truly for the most badass properties.
So some of you maybe wondering what the heck is going on to justify the costs and what extra do you really get?
First thing to advise is that you will never employ/commission an architectural photoshoot for a poky student flat in the city. Even if you are going to clean, tidy, and paint your property and pay to get it on the front page of your local estate agency or management agency marketing media, you are still only going to need a real-estate photographer.
Secondly it would be understandable for a real-estate photographer to turn down an Architectural photoshoot, and equally an architectural photographer to be insulted to shoot a real-estate job.
Reasons being is that a real-estate photographer will gawk at the amout of extra effort required to shoot architecturally and a architectural photographer would not want to put their name to "lower" quality work.
Basically:
Real-estate Photography: showing the property as a whole, its size, shape, the layout of the rooms and the relationships between rooms.
Requirements: wide as possible, basic lighting, basic editing, every room.
Architectural Photography : Taking timeless images with attention to details, architectural design features, interior design features, artistic relationships between spaces, lighting and design elements.
Requirements: Be an artist. multiple off camera lighting and natural lighting control, Time, advanced editing, considerations for final print / media usage.
More detail:
Real-estate Photography in all honesty is not as high end as architectural photography. There is greater time and budget considerations and usually "average" properties getting shots for an average sales or marketing for letting are not set up in a way that warrants the expense for architectural photography. The majority of properties, do not have "special" details, design aspects of interest, a considered integration of lighting and interior elements such as furniture, decoration and space layout. This is true also of new build properties even if they are fully dressed/interiorly designed for show. Architectural Photography is truly for the most badass properties.
If you were starting with a new system for real estate photography and video what would you recommend? Gh4, a7ii, nx1, 70d, 6d, etc? Want full frame and touch screen and 4k. That doesn't really exist at this point.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy RE photography but am also interested in architectural ph. as well. Do you suggest just going out for fun and taking shots around town(city) that I think may qualify as arch. photog??? To get my feet wet , so to speak??
ReplyDeleteHow hard is it to get permission from property owners for that kind of thing?
Have you considered jumping over to A. Photography yourself?? Is the $$ comparable in RE once you take in the quantity of jobs? Just wondering. :)
Happy Holidays!!!
I enjoy RE photography but am also interested in architectural ph. as well. Do you suggest just going out for fun and taking shots around town(city) that I think may qualify as arch. photog??? To get my feet wet , so to speak??
ReplyDeleteHow hard is it to get permission from property owners for that kind of thing?
Have you considered jumping over to A. Photography yourself?? Is the $$ comparable in RE once you take in the quantity of jobs? Just wondering. :)
Happy Holidays!!!
Its a great pleasure reading your post.Its full of information I am looking for and I love to post a comment that "The content of your post is awesome" Great work.real estate photography
ReplyDeleteBeautiful! I enjoyed my time spent on your lovely blog.
ReplyDeleteclipping path service
Car Image Editing service
Background Removal Service
Photo Editing Services
Very significant Information for us, I have think the representation of this Information is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am too close and agreed with your recommendation for summer Real Estate Photography.
ReplyDeleteSo good this thing about "Real Estate Photography Vs Architectural Photography" Thank you for this blog. Image Retouching
ReplyDeletePhoto Editing Helps
Neck Joint
Photoshop Guideline
Clipping Path Tutorial
Drop Shadow Helps
Background Remove
Image Editing
Image Cut Out
Photo Manipulation
I really find it so wonderful and nice.
ReplyDeleteI will wish to make mine just like yours
to make mine more prefect. All the same,
thank you for the information that you have shared here
right for everyone of us.car-image-editing
All in one solution for the SEO, Thank you so much for sharing, it’s very helpful and you own one of the best on the internet. AVAILABLE PUPPIES Thanks for sharing! please keep it up Maintains!
ReplyDeleteGreat post. Is something that helps to get quality backlinks for your website. There are various sites that boost the traffic of your website. TESTIMONIALS Thanks for sharing! please keep it up Maintains!
ReplyDelete"Real estate photography vs. architectural photography: It's all about capturing the essence. From showcasing practical layouts to highlighting intricate design details, each serves its purpose beautifully. Choose wisely to tell your property's unique story! #thailand capcut template"
ReplyDeleteReally you have written a good blog. I have found your list through an organic search. Alaskan Thunderfuck Seeds This article was really helpful for me. Thanks for publishing a good article. I really appreciate your efforts.
ReplyDelete